Federation of the World

If you run across people in any religion that call evil good, beware:

Isaiah 5:20New International Version (NIV)

20 Woe to those who call evil good
    and good evil,
who put darkness for light
    and light for darkness,
who put bitter for sweet
    and sweet for bitter.
Realize that the financial Federation of the World is an anglo banking universality, eminating from the Square Mile where Gog and Magog are two statues overlooking the City of London.

Pagan British poetTennyson's Federation of the World may have been Gene Roddenberry's motivation for the Federation in Star Trek. 

Heard the heavens fill with shouting, and there rain'd a ghastly dew
From the nations' airy navies grappling in the central blue;

Far along the world-wide whisper of the south-wind rushing warm,
With the standards of the peoples plunging thro' the thunder-storm;

Till the war-drum throbb'd no longer, and the battle-flags were furl'd
In the Parliament of man, the Federation of the world.

There the common sense of most shall hold a fretful realm in awe,
And the kindly earth shall slumber, lapt in universal law.

It turns our that Tennyson and the UK royalty viewed the British Empire, especially the Square Mile, as the New Rome. The goal of the New World Order back in those days was to merge the UK with the breakaway USA.

There is additional proof of this desire to fuse the UK and the USA, as Cecil Rhodes, who was one of the richest men in the world and owner of DeBeers Diamonds, called for a New World Order controlled by British finance.

1. Cecil Rhodes was familiar with the founder of Zionism, Theodor Herzl, and understood Herzl's desire for colonial rule over Palestine, and had a favorable attitude toward Zionism:

Exhibit A in the ‘Zionism is Colonialism’ file, and perhaps sufficient evidence in and of itself, is a letter written by Theodor Herzl, the father of Zionism (one of Wilf’s “visionary Jewish thinkers and leaders”), in his diary and intended for Cecil Rhodes, perhaps the most identifiable figure with English colonialism. Rhodes is the namesake of the former British Colony of Rhodesia (note: it is today called Zimbabwe, Rhodes is not a name native to Southern Africa) and the man who contributed this gem of a colonialist maxim for posterity: “I would annex the planets if I could.”

2. Cecil Rhodes was financed by the Rothschilds who also financed Zionism, and Herzl.

So it is not unusual to find out that Israel takes a central place in the Anglo/American Empire. It is more like the Anglo/American/Zionist Empire, with Zionism not being Judaism at all, but rather a colonial doctrine and action to take over old Palestine. 


From Wikipedia we see:

Historian Carroll Quigley claimed that the Round Table Groups were connected to a secret society, which South African diamond baron Cecil Rhodes is believed to have set up with similar goals. Rhodes was believed by some to have formed this secret society in his lifetime. This secret society is supposed to have been named the Society of the Elect.[7]
Rhodes first formalised his idea with William T. Stead, editor of the Pall Mall Gazette, when he and Stead agreed on the structure of the secret society. This proposed secret society had an elaborate hierarchical structure, based on that of the Jesuits, which comprised: at the top, the position of "General of the Society"—a position modelled on the General of the Jesuits—to be occupied by Rhodes, with Stead and Lord Rothschild as his designated successors; an executive committee called the "Junta of Three", comprising Stead, Milner and Reginald Baliol Brett (Lord Esher); then a "Circle of Initiates", consisting of a number of notables including Cardinal Manning, Lord Arthur Balfour, Lord Albert Grey and Sir Harry Johnston; and outside of this was the "Association of Helpers", the broad mass of the Society.

Is Masonic doctrine and other secret doctrine central the Rhodes empire? Well, it is secret, so I don't know. Freemasonry is likely a tool, just like the Jesuit vision is a tool for big money to impose financial control, a cashless society, etc. Freemasons have led Israel, so there may be a direct link.

Kabbalah is certainly supportive of Zionism. Leo Strauss, father of the Neoconservatives, who are Zionists from many races, practiced Kabbalah.

Arthur Goldwag whose blog is here has said these things but keep in mind that I am not terribly interested in the massive details of all this. Just a general synopsis is good enough for me. Focus on good and not on evil:

A number of leading conservatives in Washington turn out to be Straussians--Locke's piece identifies some of the most prominent circa 2002:
"Justice Clarence Thomas; Supreme Court nominee Robert Bork; Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz; former Assistant Secretary of State Alan Keyes; former Secretary of Education William Bennett; Weekly Standard editor and former Quayle Chief of Staff William Kristol; Allan Bloom, author of THE CLOSING OF THE AMERICAN MIND; former New York Post editorials editor John Podhoretz; former National Endowment for the Humanities Deputy Chairman John T. Agresto; and, not meaning to class myself with this august company but in the interests of full disclosure, myself."
and:

Though Strauss was an atheist, he was culturally Jewish to the core. And hermeneutics is a prototypically Jewish practice. Kabbalists acknowledge that every Biblical text has four distinct levels of meaning:

Pashat (simple), its literal surface Remez (hints), suggestions (mostly through paradoxes and double-meanings) that something lies deeper
Drash (search), allegorical, symbolic, or analogic interpretations
Sod (hidden), its deepest, most mystical level of meaning
Goldwag goes on to say that the Masons borrowed this Kabbalah system, and I interpret this Kabbalah doctrine to actually be a Gnosticism, beyond the Bible. So, the Bible says Israel (the temple and the Old Covenant) would be destroyed. History says it was in 70 AD that the nation of Israel faced the tribulation of destruction.

But Kabbalah mysticism (which comes from Judaism but isn't Judaism of the prophets),  says that the Jewish right to Palestine exists ongoing. But clearly, the Zionists took Israel by force, not by divine right. God preordained this evil (just as he preordained the sacrifice of Jesus Christ). He did so to establish the truth of Luke 21:24, that Israel is a sign to the elect that the Gentiles are full up saved and the Jews or those with even a little Jewish connection and DNA could be grafted onto the olive tree once again. From 1948 on, this truth stands. I was born in 1949!

Kabbalah supports Zionism, by this Gnosticism. Zionism according to the prophets, is a fake Zion, established by man and not by Messiah. And that fake Zion is now one of the three pillars of the most powerful empire now in the world, the Anglo/American/Israeli Empire. God alone will simply have to start over at the Second Coming of Jesus Christ, and we Christians believe that will be the case.

Add to all this that Rhodes helped form the League of Nations which is refashioned as the United Nations, the Federation for our time! Ted Turner says the United Nations should rule the world. And that is where we are, with a globalist financial system that is powerful, and with the eastern nations, Russia and China, fighting to stay sovereign in a world of empire. Their efforts may prove to be futile, if somewhat noble. It is so strange for me to look to those flawed nations as a counterbalance to the evils of the empire we find ourselves living in. This does not mean I support or would want to live in those nations. I just want the West to seek peace and be cooperative in world trade with everyone!

The final person to talk about the Federation was none other than the self avowed atheistic founder of Israel itself. David Ben-Gurion made this troubling, unbiblical statement:

 “In Jerusalem, the United Nations (a truly United Nations) will build a Shrine of the Prophets to serve the federated union of all continents; this will be the seat of the Supreme Court of Mankind, to settle all controversies among the federated continents, as prophesied by Isaiah.”

So, while the Jesuits, who likely support some version of a New World Order, are less obvious in support of Israel and are at least divided, Kabbalah and Freemasonry have been linked directly to the New World Order that is inclusive of Israel holding a central role.

I must add that Theosophy is a New World Order cult movement, historically connected to Kabbalah and more recently a British and Indian (India was controlled by Britain), movement. But Ghandi opposed Zionism in a very reasoned statement. 

Still, the connection between the British Empire and Zionism is as if they are one, in a desire for a New World Order and a satanic one, filled with secret societies, at that.

Even Baha'i is supported by Zionism, as most likely the secret societies are, both from the Rothschild and Rockefeller treasure chests. Getting people to buy into a New World Order that seems wonderful but is darkness, is right up Cecil Rhodes alley, and it should be no surprise that Baha'i is supported.

The pagan promised redeemer is a man, not God, a leader of the New World Order. But, of course the antiChrist already came in the form of Nero, or Trajan or perhaps a Zealot, so the return of Christ is not dependent on this pagan man of the future, which is based on a misinterpretation of holy scripture, being revealed.  











 
Gadi Taub is right that Israel’s settlements in the occupied territory are a huge problem. But he is wrong when he says that somehow "settlements and continued occupation” will undermine the vision of Theodor Herzl, founder of political Zionism. In fact occupation was central to Herzl’s plans. Taub claims that Herzl’s Zionism was part of the “tradition of democratic national liberation movements.” But the truth is quite the opposite. Herzl’s Zionism was old-fashioned turn-of-the-century colonialism.
His diary includes the text of a letter Herzl wrote to Cecil Rhodes, shortly after the infamous Briton had colonized the land of the Shona people in Africa – whose land he claimed and renamed Rhodesia. “You are being invited to help make history,” Herzl wrote to Rhodes. “[I]t doesn’t involve Africa, but a piece of Asia Minor; not Englishmen but Jews… How, then, do I happen to turn to you since this is an out-of-the-way matter for you? How indeed? Because it is something colonial… [Y]ou, Mr. Rhodes, are a visionary politician or a practical visionary… I want you to.. put the stamp of your authority on the Zionist plan and to make the following declaration to a few people who swear by you: I, Rhodes have examined this plan and found it correct and practicable. It is a plan full of culture, excellent for the group of people for whom it is directly designed, and quite good for England, for Greater Britain…."
- See more at: http://mondoweiss.net/2010/09/actually-herzl-was-a-colonialist#sthash.EoWgzVjr.dpuf
Gadi Taub is right that Israel’s settlements in the occupied territory are a huge problem. But he is wrong when he says that somehow "settlements and continued occupation” will undermine the vision of Theodor Herzl, founder of political Zionism. In fact occupation was central to Herzl’s plans. Taub claims that Herzl’s Zionism was part of the “tradition of democratic national liberation movements.” But the truth is quite the opposite. Herzl’s Zionism was old-fashioned turn-of-the-century colonialism.
His diary includes the text of a letter Herzl wrote to Cecil Rhodes, shortly after the infamous Briton had colonized the land of the Shona people in Africa – whose land he claimed and renamed Rhodesia. “You are being invited to help make history,” Herzl wrote to Rhodes. “[I]t doesn’t involve Africa, but a piece of Asia Minor; not Englishmen but Jews… How, then, do I happen to turn to you since this is an out-of-the-way matter for you? How indeed? Because it is something colonial… [Y]ou, Mr. Rhodes, are a visionary politician or a practical visionary… I want you to.. put the stamp of your authority on the Zionist plan and to make the following declaration to a few people who swear by you: I, Rhodes have examined this plan and found it correct and practicable. It is a plan full of culture, excellent for the group of people for whom it is directly designed, and quite good for England, for Greater Britain…."
- See more at: http://mondoweiss.net/2010/09/actually-herzl-was-a-colonialist#sthash.EoWgzVjr.dpuf

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Gospel Alone is the Power of God

My Christian View of Israel's Purpose