Analysis of the 1689 Second London Baptist Confession
This is a discussion about how the 1689 Second London Confession represents a falling away from the First London Baptist Confession. There is a comparison to the Protestant John Calvin as well as a discussion about the continued falling away of the Reformed Baptists and lack of commitment to the truth by virtually all the other New Covenant Theologians! The 1689 Second Confession is very subtle. But it is just as wrong as Calvin regarding the law! The moral law, or weighty matters of the Old Covenant law is used by the Protestant fake religion (Protestants were Augustinians), to lift guilt to the status of saving conviction. We see this error clearly but subtly explained in the 1689 Second London Baptist Confession: "This saving repentance is an evangelical grace, whereby a person, being by the Holy Spirit made sensible of the manifold evils of his sin, doth, by faith in Christ, humble himself for it with godly sorrow, detestation of it, and self-abhorrency, praying for pa