The too big to fail banks are part of a financial cabal that is pushing up prices on food, oil, houses and who are oppressing everyone else in varying degrees. These bankers will be judged for their evil deeds and they will be part of God's elect.
When Lloyd Blankfein of Goldman Sachs says he is doing God's will and people in west Africa starve because of massive trading and speculation from cornering markets, he is lying. He is doomed to hell for his evil deeds and words.
And the oppression that comes from the banks when folks need money for business and are forced to take an interest rate swap is an oppression that costs all Americans more money. The bankers graze and take and give little in return.
The Apostle Paul said that the wealthy oppress the poor. This has never been so consolidated as it is in the power the banker cabal now has. The financiers have over 40 percent of the wealth and they are .5 percent of the entire population. This is oppression.
The elect will make it through, but the elect will suffer more than what would be necessary in the affluent western world.
The bankers have their fun and decadence now, but they will pay a heavy price at judgement day. For more information read the articles at my blog:Recourse-Loans.com where I reject the lending practices and financial reality that is this new world financial order.
Friday, May 10, 2013
Sunday, May 5, 2013
Predestined to Hell
The human mind cannot always take in the sobering reality of predestination. We who are predestined are greatful, but sorrowful. We know many we love are not so predestined. It hurts. Paul said he could wish that he would suffer if his kinsmen would be saved.
But it is also that same Apostle Paul who told the truth in Romans chapter 9, that some vessels were created for special use, like fancy kitchenware, and others were created for menial use, to be thrown away.
The truth is, sin is created by those who are not kept from it. The devil and Adam created sin in their acts of defiance, having been permitted to have a will apart from the will of God. They used that will to create sin. It is always that way. Only God is good, and only His Will is sinless.
So then, there are a few predestined to heaven, through God given faith. And there are many, including many who believed in predestination like Calvin and the Protestants, who are predestined to hell. They were created for menial use only to be meant for the refuse pile. Calvin believed only in Old Covenant, and was clueless about the New Covenant and its differences. And he was a murderer.
If the Protestants are destined for hell, where does that leave the Catholics? The same predetermined result awaits them as well. Both religions were very similar in their hatred of the New Covenant.
I suggest that this is hard for many, but the elect are saved from this anger towards God that is a part of our fallen nature. In Adam all mankind fell, and some are redeemed by grace, while the majority are created to be destroyed. (2 Peter 2:12)
Now, animals are created to be destroyed in this life, like cattle. But this destruction of the unbelievers will be eternal. Animals are to be redeemed, and their demise is temporary. (Rev 5:13-14) But they teach us that the unelect, those not elected to be saved, will be eternally destroyed.
-----------------------------------------
As far as the concept of double predestination is concerned, this is mostly about semantics. Now it is false doctrine to teach that the non elect were predestined to hell because God just didn't like them. They were predestinated to hell because Adam and Satan chose to reject God.
However, those subsequent to Adam are born with a sin nature that insures their predestination to hell if they are not chosen to be redeemed. In this context, of the sin nature being inherited, it could be said that Jacob was loved by God and his brother hated before they were yet born.
But it is also that same Apostle Paul who told the truth in Romans chapter 9, that some vessels were created for special use, like fancy kitchenware, and others were created for menial use, to be thrown away.
The truth is, sin is created by those who are not kept from it. The devil and Adam created sin in their acts of defiance, having been permitted to have a will apart from the will of God. They used that will to create sin. It is always that way. Only God is good, and only His Will is sinless.
So then, there are a few predestined to heaven, through God given faith. And there are many, including many who believed in predestination like Calvin and the Protestants, who are predestined to hell. They were created for menial use only to be meant for the refuse pile. Calvin believed only in Old Covenant, and was clueless about the New Covenant and its differences. And he was a murderer.
If the Protestants are destined for hell, where does that leave the Catholics? The same predetermined result awaits them as well. Both religions were very similar in their hatred of the New Covenant.
I suggest that this is hard for many, but the elect are saved from this anger towards God that is a part of our fallen nature. In Adam all mankind fell, and some are redeemed by grace, while the majority are created to be destroyed. (2 Peter 2:12)
Now, animals are created to be destroyed in this life, like cattle. But this destruction of the unbelievers will be eternal. Animals are to be redeemed, and their demise is temporary. (Rev 5:13-14) But they teach us that the unelect, those not elected to be saved, will be eternally destroyed.
-----------------------------------------
As far as the concept of double predestination is concerned, this is mostly about semantics. Now it is false doctrine to teach that the non elect were predestined to hell because God just didn't like them. They were predestinated to hell because Adam and Satan chose to reject God.
However, those subsequent to Adam are born with a sin nature that insures their predestination to hell if they are not chosen to be redeemed. In this context, of the sin nature being inherited, it could be said that Jacob was loved by God and his brother hated before they were yet born.
Wednesday, May 1, 2013
Australian gay rights advocate Alex Greenwich compared to Stalin | News.com.au
Australian gay rights advocate Alex Greenwich compared to Stalin | News.com.au
Here is the deal. This article is hard to follow, but there are, apparently, words being thrown around by both sides. This is the way I look at it. Yes, being gay is not being Christian. That is obvious from reading the bible. But, the early Christians were tolerant. They lived side by side with people who did not agree with them.
Jesus advocated separation of church and state when he said that His Kingdom was not of this world. His Kingdom is not the same as a civil government!
Therefore, tolerance, opposition to sacralism, dominionism, theocracy and all the other words to describe fusion of church and state must be the only true Christian position.
True Christians tolerate. False Christians hurl angry words and insults against lifestyles they don't agree with. They become worse than the gay folks, who just want to be left alone. Leave them alone!
Here is the deal. This article is hard to follow, but there are, apparently, words being thrown around by both sides. This is the way I look at it. Yes, being gay is not being Christian. That is obvious from reading the bible. But, the early Christians were tolerant. They lived side by side with people who did not agree with them.
Jesus advocated separation of church and state when he said that His Kingdom was not of this world. His Kingdom is not the same as a civil government!
Therefore, tolerance, opposition to sacralism, dominionism, theocracy and all the other words to describe fusion of church and state must be the only true Christian position.
True Christians tolerate. False Christians hurl angry words and insults against lifestyles they don't agree with. They become worse than the gay folks, who just want to be left alone. Leave them alone!
Saturday, April 20, 2013
Gospel Conviction and Law Condemnation (guilt) Are Different!
I cannot impress upon people that this is the root issue with true believers and those who think they believe but don't. That doesn't mean that getting the doctrine right makes one a true believer, but getting it wrong shows unbelief and false confessions.
So, gospel conviction is true doctrine. Law guilt is not the same as gospel conviction, yet the foundation of Protestant and Catholic teaching is that law conviction brings true repentance, Godly repentance. That is a false teaching from the pit of hell.
These religious organizations have condemned themselves by the uniform teaching they have that law condemnation is the same as gospel conviction of unbelief.
And they deceive many.
Here is the doctrinal discussion about gospel conviction in my article entitled Gospel Preaching.
So, gospel conviction is true doctrine. Law guilt is not the same as gospel conviction, yet the foundation of Protestant and Catholic teaching is that law conviction brings true repentance, Godly repentance. That is a false teaching from the pit of hell.
These religious organizations have condemned themselves by the uniform teaching they have that law condemnation is the same as gospel conviction of unbelief.
And they deceive many.
Here is the doctrinal discussion about gospel conviction in my article entitled Gospel Preaching.
Tuesday, April 9, 2013
Ronald Reagan Was Not as Great a Man as You All Think: From Thatcher Link
Margaret Thatcher Died Today and I Am Not Sorry
This is the Patrick.net link that includes my article. I wanted to blog it because the discussion is a good one. I suggest people read it.
In response to one fellow I said the following, which is an explanation of the Wikipedia passage that reveals Reagan's involvement in the deregulation of housing:
And their anti union exploits were a precursor to globalization, where wages have been destroyed by the arbitrage of labor and the offshoring of all that was strong about America.
This is the Patrick.net link that includes my article. I wanted to blog it because the discussion is a good one. I suggest people read it.
In response to one fellow I said the following, which is an explanation of the Wikipedia passage that reveals Reagan's involvement in the deregulation of housing:
Now, I don't cheer Thatcher's death, but I am not sorry either.
And Reagan? Well, if people knew this they might change their minds about him:
From Wikipedia we get this telling information:
"In 1982, Congress passed the Alternative Mortgage Transactions Parity Act (AMTPA), which allowed non-federally chartered housing creditors to write adjustable-rate mortgages. This bi-partisan legislation was, according to the Urban Institute, intended to "increase the volume of loan products that reduced the up-front costs to borrowers in order to make homeownership more affordable."[128] Among the new mortgage loan types created and gaining in popularity in the early 1980s were adjustable-rate, option adjustable-rate, balloon-payment and interest-only mortgages. Subsequent widespread abuses of predatory lending occurred with the use of adjustable-rate mortgages.[49][129] Approximately 90% of subprime mortgages issued in 2006 were adjustable-rate mortgages.[4"
So, Indi, Reagan in 1982 was responsible for putting into motion a chain of events that resulted in the housing bubble. And Thatcher put him up to it because he adopted Thatcherism that started in 1975.That pretty much says it all. Reagan and Thatcher allowed the bankers to take over the world, put the process in motion. And so, their exploits against communism are diminished as we understand this fact.
And their anti union exploits were a precursor to globalization, where wages have been destroyed by the arbitrage of labor and the offshoring of all that was strong about America.
Margaret Thatcher: Sermon on the Mound - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Sermon on the Mound - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
How many ways can a person speak and condemn themselves to hell? Margaret Thatcher did so here. She said people had free will. They don't. She said Christ had a large influence on Thatcherite reforms, yet she made the rich richer and the poor poorer. She set in motion the housing bubble in the USA.
Libertarianism, which was what Thatcherism was, is godless. It is the religion of self, and teaches that the invisible hand of self interest, or selfishness, ultimately benefits society. Unfortunately, when the wealthy take over banking and offer toxic loans that people can't pay back, self interest and deregulation creates havoc.
For more on libertarianism read my ebook, Libertarianism, the UK Big Bang, and How They Ruined America.
Thatcher was an evil woman, who destroyed the unions when all she had to do was to destroy the excess of unions. Now capital has a big advantage over workers.
And Thatcher put the bankers in charge. So did Reagan in the US. Not many people know this is true. Read my blog at Say No to Recourse Loans to understand this situation we are in with derivatives and bubbles.
How many ways can a person speak and condemn themselves to hell? Margaret Thatcher did so here. She said people had free will. They don't. She said Christ had a large influence on Thatcherite reforms, yet she made the rich richer and the poor poorer. She set in motion the housing bubble in the USA.
Libertarianism, which was what Thatcherism was, is godless. It is the religion of self, and teaches that the invisible hand of self interest, or selfishness, ultimately benefits society. Unfortunately, when the wealthy take over banking and offer toxic loans that people can't pay back, self interest and deregulation creates havoc.
For more on libertarianism read my ebook, Libertarianism, the UK Big Bang, and How They Ruined America.
Thatcher was an evil woman, who destroyed the unions when all she had to do was to destroy the excess of unions. Now capital has a big advantage over workers.
And Thatcher put the bankers in charge. So did Reagan in the US. Not many people know this is true. Read my blog at Say No to Recourse Loans to understand this situation we are in with derivatives and bubbles.
Sunday, April 7, 2013
Christian leaders mourn with Rick Warren over son's suicide | On Faith & Culture
Christian leaders mourn with Rick Warren over son's suicide | On Faith & Culture
Most people see no problem with this. However, Paul said if you sell the gospel you are not approved as a minister. That means Rick Warren and the famous ministers of our time are phony and are not approved. I don't feel sorry for people who get rich off of selling the gospel.
If these people would stop selling the gospel they can publish whatever other books they want for profit.
But until they do they, unfortunately, reap the rewards of this clear and obvious violation of the new Law of Christ.
Most people see no problem with this. However, Paul said if you sell the gospel you are not approved as a minister. That means Rick Warren and the famous ministers of our time are phony and are not approved. I don't feel sorry for people who get rich off of selling the gospel.
If these people would stop selling the gospel they can publish whatever other books they want for profit.
But until they do they, unfortunately, reap the rewards of this clear and obvious violation of the new Law of Christ.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)